By noon on September 1st, we will know who are running for the 89 seats in the parliament.
As voters we are all keen to know who the candidates are. The irony is that the majority voters don’t really know who their current member of parliament is to begin with. I know who mine is, but I have not met nor spoken to him ever. That being the reality, how would you go about making a considered and fair assessment of how you should be casting your vote.
Let me offer up a short checklist to help with the thinking:
- Is your’s, your family’s and of Singapore’s future important to you?
- If you said YES to 1, do you think the candidate(s) in your ballot paper will be able to deliver the future you want?
- If you said NO to 1, it does not matter who you vote for. So VOTE, PLEASE DON’T SPOIL THE VOTE EVEN THOUGH YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO SPOIL IT.
- If you said YES to 2, have you understood who the candidate(s) is(are) and where they stand on issues that is of concern to you? Have you done sufficient research to be able to be honest to yourself to come to a decision?
- If you said NO to 2, are you prepared to find out why you think they cannot deliver the future you want?
- If you said NO to 5, it does not matter who you vote for. So VOTE, PLEASE DON’T SPOIL THE VOTE EVEN THOUGH YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO SPOIL IT.
- If you said YES to 5, do spend time reading, talking to family, friends, colleagues or just about any other Singaporean voter. Do make sure that you get to hear from all sides not just one side.
See, it is quite easy to navigate the silly season.
Do be aware that what is called “Mainstream Media” (MSM), which especially in the Singapore context, has very low credibility in terms of being fair, balanced and critical. These MSM include the newspapers, TV and radio owned and operated by Singapore Press Holdings and MediaCorp. These entities are government-linked companies and have never been known to challenge or be critical of government policies. Investigative and critical reporting is NOT what they can ever do (or to be fair, allowed to do).
Having said all of that, do take about 10 minutes to listen to this TEDx talk that discusses how entities, like governments and political parties, would do all that they can to astroturf opinion and understanding of issues. Don’t be lulled by catchphrases, innuendoes, carrots, meat etc.
And, yes, this post could perhaps be also playing that game.
tedx is too chim for the 80%. Just ask any layman 2 questions: would you dare to criticize your boss? who is the boss of shit times, shit bao, mediashit?
in which case, hopefully the 20% would explain to the 80%.